Freshness note: This analysis was last updated 31 days ago. Fast-moving policy claims can change quickly, so check for newer official updates before relying on this verdict.
“A laser weapon called the LOCUST system was responsible for shutting down El Paso's airspace”
Summary
A claim circulated that a laser weapon system called LOCUST caused an airspace closure over El Paso. LOCUST (Low-Cost Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Swarming Technology) is a real Navy program focused on drone swarms, not laser weapons. The connection between any military laser system and an El Paso airspace closure requires verification.
Primary Sources
Official documentation of the LOCUST program, which focuses on launching multiple unmanned aerial vehicles from ships, not laser weapons
Reported source describing laser weapon involvement in El Paso airspace shutdown
Federal Aviation Administration records of temporary flight restrictions or airspace closures in the El Paso region
Evidence Supporting the Claim
- The Department of Defense has developed various directed energy weapons programs in recent years
- Military installations near El Paso, including Fort Bliss and White Sands Missile Range, conduct weapons testing
Evidence Against / Context
- LOCUST is officially designated as a drone swarm launcher system developed by the Office of Naval Research, not a laser weapon system
- No confirmed official Department of Defense or FAA statements linking a laser weapon system to an El Paso airspace closure have been publicly verified
- Standard military weapons testing protocols typically involve pre-announced temporary flight restrictions rather than emergency airspace closures
Timeline
Reported airspace closure over El Paso allegedly linked to laser weapon system
Axios report published connecting LOCUST system to El Paso airspace shutdown
Office of Naval Research announced LOCUST program for drone swarm technology
What This Means
Structured interpretation — not opinion
Key takeaway 1
LOCUST is a documented Navy program, but its official purpose relates to launching drone swarms, not laser weaponry, suggesting potential confusion between different defense programs
Key takeaway 2
Military installations near El Paso do conduct weapons testing that can require airspace restrictions, making the general concept plausible but requiring specific verification
Key takeaway 3
The lack of verifiable official statements from the FAA or Department of Defense makes it difficult to confirm the specific claim without additional documentation
Key takeaway 4
Confusion between different military acronyms and weapons systems is common in defense reporting, requiring careful verification of technical details
Related Claims in defense
“A U.S. submarine sank an Iranian ship during the current conflict”
No credible evidence exists of a U.S. submarine sinking an Iranian ship in any recent or ongoing conflict as of March 2026. No official U.S. Department of Defense announcements, Iranian government statements, or verified news reports document such an incident. The claim lacks supporting documentation from authoritative sources.
“The U.S. campaign in Iran has already expended hundreds of high-cost air defense missiles and thousands of other munitions just days into the conflict”
As of March 2026, there is no verified U.S. military campaign in Iran. No credible government or military sources confirm active U.S. combat operations, missile expenditures, or munitions usage in Iran during this timeframe. This claim cannot be substantiated with available evidence from official sources.