Freshness note: This analysis was last updated 27 days ago. Fast-moving policy claims can change quickly, so check for newer official updates before relying on this verdict.
“Savannah Guthrie's husband Michael Feldman is listed as a 'co-conspirator' in the Epstein files”
Summary
Michael Feldman, husband of NBC journalist Savannah Guthrie, does not appear as a co-conspirator in court documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. The claim appears to originate from fabricated lists circulated on social media that misrepresent the contents of unsealed court documents from a 2015 defamation lawsuit involving Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell.
Primary Sources
Fact-checking organization examined the claim and found no evidence Feldman appears in Epstein-related court documents as a co-conspirator
Court documents from the defamation case brought by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell that were unsealed in multiple batches starting in 2019
Evidence Against / Context
- Michael Feldman does not appear in the unsealed court documents from the Giuffre v. Maxwell case
- The term co-conspirator does not appear in relation to Feldman in publicly available Epstein-related court filings
- Fact-checking organizations found no credible evidence linking Feldman to Epstein documents
- The claim appears to originate from unverified social media posts containing fabricated lists of names
- No law enforcement agency has identified Feldman in connection with Epstein-related investigations
Timeline
Virginia Giuffre filed defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell in U.S. District Court
Federal court began unsealing documents from the Giuffre v. Maxwell case
Additional batches of documents from the case were released to the public
False claims about individuals being named as co-conspirators began circulating on social media
What This Means
Structured interpretation — not opinion
Key takeaway 1
The unsealed Epstein-related documents contain names of individuals connected to Jeffrey Epstein, but Michael Feldman is not among them
Key takeaway 2
Fabricated lists have circulated online that falsely claim to represent contents of court documents, contributing to misinformation
Key takeaway 3
The term co-conspirator has specific legal meaning and does not appear in connection with Feldman in any official court records
Key takeaway 4
Claims about public figures being named in sensitive legal documents should be verified against official court records before being shared
Related Claims in misinformation
“Video showing a toddler crying over the casket of a U.S. service member killed in Iran is AI-generated”
A video circulating online that purports to show a toddler crying over the casket of a U.S. service member killed in Iran contains visual artifacts consistent with AI-generated content. Fact-checking organizations have identified multiple indicators of artificial generation in the footage, and no credible reports exist of U.S. service members killed in Iran matching the circumstances depicted in the video.
“The Epstein files 'expose Ellen DeGeneres' as a cannibal”
Claims that released Epstein-related documents expose Ellen DeGeneres as a cannibal are not supported by any evidence in the actual court files. This claim appears to have originated from AI-generated audio content that fabricated statements attributed to individuals in the case. No credible evidence exists linking DeGeneres to Jeffrey Epstein or supporting cannibalism allegations.
“Trump posted a video on Truth Social portraying Barack Obama and Michelle Obama as apes”
Donald Trump posted a video to his Truth Social account in February 2025 that included AI-generated imagery depicting Barack Obama and Michelle Obama as apes. The video was confirmed to have been shared from Trump's official Truth Social account by multiple fact-checking organizations and news outlets.